Rosie Jimenez1970s, 20s, texas, illegalmidwife, illegalpostroeSUMMARY: Rosie Jiminez, age 27, died on October 3, 1977 after an abortion perpetrated by a midwife in McAllen, Texas.
In 1976, the Hyde Amendment went into effect, banning the use of Federal funds to pay for abortions except to save the mother from an immediate threat to her life. The measure was named for its author, Congressman Henry Hyde.
Abortion advocates had been keening from the moment the Hyde Amendment was up for vote. They painted a ghastly picture of coathanger-impaled women littering the streets as poor women were driven to desperation by lack of “access.”
So when the Hyde Amendment went into effect, abortion advocates sat back and waited for a death, any death, they could hang around Henry Hyde’s neck.
On October 3, 1977, the abortion advocacy vultures got what they’d been waiting for: a dead woman they could use as leverage in the fight to once again force taxpayers to fund elective abortions.Rosie’s Death Table of ContentsRosie’s DeathThe Set-UpThe AbortionTo The HospitalHardly UnexpectedHow Valid a Claim?ConclusionsOn September 26, 1977, 27-year-old Rosie Jiminez showed up at the emergency room of McAllen General Hospital in the Texas border town of McAllen, with septic shock. She was put in intensive care, but died on October 3 from renal and cardiac failure caused by disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (an overwhelming problem with blood clotting) triggered by gas gangrene from a criminal abortion. She left behind one child. The Set-Up
Rosie had already undergone two abortions at taxpayer expense. The first time, she had not been using contraception, and a private ob/gyn in McAllen aborted her 9-week fetus on July 15, 1975. She went on birth control pills after this abortion, but quit using them when a physician told her they might impair future fertility. She quickly became pregnant again and had a second tax-funded abortion, this one done at a facility Rosie had been referred to by a local Planned Parenthood, at 11 weeks of pregnancy.
The CDC’s investigation after Rosie’s death could not determine if she used any form of birth control after this second abortion. She became pregnant yet again. In September of 1977, she suspected that she was again pregnant, and consulted with a cousin and a friend, who told her that Medicaid would no longer pay for elective abortions.
Rosie had also gone to her family physician, Dr. Homer, in McAllen for treatment of pain in her sternum. She mentioned that she might be pregnant. The physician did not arrange for a pregnancy test or discuss her options with her in any way. He simply informed her that Medicaid would no longer pay for abortions, and let it rest at that.
It is interesting to note that in all the finger-pointing following Rosie’s death, no prochoicer thought to place any blame on this physician. Evidently he knew about the two previous Medicaid abortions. Why did he consent himself with telling Rosie that there would be no more free abortions? A referral seemed to have been in order, either to a prolife center that would help her with the expenses of continuing the pregnancy, or to the local Planned Parenthood, that could arrange an abortion on a sliding scale and could possibly help her tap into private funds for elective abortions. Dr. Homer, in fact, was very much in favor of abortions and was aware the Dr. C performed them and Planned Parenthood referred for them on a sliding scale.
Regardless, Rosie’s physician just dropped the news — no more tax-funded abortions — and effectively abandoned his patient.The Abortion
The week of September 19, Rosie went to Mexico for some sort of injection to cause an abortion. She had the shots at a pharmacy, at $5 each. The second injection made her ill, and she abandoned this means of attempting to get rid of the unwanted fetus.
On September 25, she consulted with her cousin, saying that she wanted to find a cheap abortionist quickly. Rosie’s cousin brought her to a lay midwife in McAllen, who charged $120 to insert a catheter into Rosie’s uterus. Fifteen minutes later, she sent Rosie home.To The Hospital
Rosie had pain and cramping upon returning home. Over the next 12 hours, she developed an increasing fever, and had nausea, vomiting, chills, dizziness, and increasing vaginal bleeding.
The next afternoon, Rosie was unable to get out of bed. She asked a friend to take her to the hospital. She was admitted at 5 p.m., roughly 22 hours after the abortion.
Rosie lied to the doctors when she was admitted, telling them that she was suffering from leg cramps and abdominal pain, saying that her period had just started and denying an abortion.
She had a fever of 100.8, a rapid pulse of 108, respiration of 24, and a blood pressure of 110/80. These vital signs are an indication that something is wrong, but are not in and of themselves alarming.
The physical examination, however, revealed cause for concern. Her abdomen was tender and guarded — meaning that she tensed up when touched. Her uterus was enlarged and tender, and her cervix was soft and dilated wide enough for doctors to pass a ring forceps inside. She had dark bloody vaginal discharge. These are all signs of a recent terminated pregnancy — whether by miscarriage or by induced abortion — with infection and possible retained tissue.
So despite Rosie’s insistence that nobody had done anything to terminate her pregnancy, McAllen General’s doctors accurately diagnosed a septic incomplete abortion. They did a blood culture and found clostridium perfringens bacteria — gas gangrene.
The doctors immediately put Rosie on intravenous antibiotics and fluids. They also performed a D&C to remove retained tissue from Rosie’s uterus. These tissues, also, showed clostridium perfringens infection. They also found placental tissue, confirming their belief that Rosie had indeed been pregnant.
Despite the aggressive treatment, Rosie’s condition deteriorated over the next twelve hours. She developed severe jaundice. Her pulse was a racing 160 beats per minute. She developed a rash over her torso and thighs. Her urine output fell, causing the doctors to suspect kidney failure.
More laboratory tests were performed, which led the doctors to believe Rosie was developing disseminated intravascular coagulopahty. They performed a hysterectomy to get rid of the source of the infection. After surgery, her blood pressure was a low 90/60, her pulse a still-rapid 120, and her respirations a panting 30 breaths per minute.
Within six hours of surgery, Rosie’s heart failed. A consulting physician recommended intense measures to support Rosie’s failing body. Over the next three days, her respiratory problems grew worse, and she was put on a ventillator.
Doctors administered medications to correct the clotting failure, antibiotics to attack the infection, and intensive supportive therapy to support her failing organ systems, to no avail. Rosie died on October 3.
What is particularly telling in Rosie’s death is that prochoice groups had been very successful in spreading the word that public funding for abortion had been cut — Rosie’s friend and cousin, as well as her physician, were well aware of this fact — but they had not managed to also pass out the word that Planned Parenthood referred for abortions on a sliding scale, and that private funds were available. It’s almost as if the public-relations departments of Planned Parenthood and other abortion-advocacy groups had deliberately increased the odds of a tragedy like Rosie’s death in order to provide the corpses needed in order to prop up a drive to restore tax monies to abortion facilities.
The initial prochoice response to news of Rosie’s death was little short of euphoric. They had their trophy, their dead woman whose story they could leverage, they hoped, into the restoration of tax money flowing into abortion clinics.
One voice stood out from the crowd: Ellen Frankfort, author of Rosie: the investigation of a wrongful death//. Frankfort was disgusted with the bulk of the prochoice movement, who seemed content to make note of the death and then milk it for political gain.
Frankfort was particularly disgusted with the response of public health officials, who made no effort to close down the illegal abortion practice where Rosie had undergone her fatal abortion.
Frankfort took it upon herself to orchestrate a sting, with local law enforcement. She coordinated a dramatic raid that put the lay abortionist out of business.
Frankfort also researched other deaths that she blamed on the Hyde Amendment:
- A woman in Louisiana who died after she had a friend insert cotton-tipped swabs into her cervix.
- Two women in New York (which continued to fund legal abortions) in 1978. Frankfort believes that the women heard publicity about the Hyde Amendment and mistakenly believed that they’d be unable to get funds.
How Valid a Claim?
There was indeed a small spike in reported illegal abortion deaths after the Hyde Amendment (from 2 in 1976 to 4 in 1977 to 7 in 1978). But there was likewise a spike in reported legal abortion deaths as well — a far larger spike, from 11 in 1976 to 17 in 1977.*
Lest prochoicers attribute this jump to women having later abortions because they need time to get funds, we’ll note that reported legal abortion deaths fall to 9 in 1978, then leap to 22 in 1979.
And although the Hyde Amendment remained in effect, reported illegal abortion deaths fell to 0 in 1979, and remained at 0, 1, 0r 2 per year. Since this is fewer than the 19 in 1979, 6 in 1974, and 4 in 1975, when federal funds were available for elective abortions, it’s hard to say that the Hyde Amendment was causing more illegal abortion deaths.
In fact, the CDC’s own study, “The Effect of Restricting Public Funds for Legal Abortion,” found “no evidence of a statistically significant increase in the number of complications from illegal abortions.” In fact, they found that while there was no change in the illegal abortion complications, there was a significant decrease in publicly funded hospitalizations for legal abortion complications in cities where funding was restricted, compared to cities in areas where state or local government picked up the tab for elective abortions.
In other words, cutting funds for elective abortions actually had a measurable positive impact on abortion complication rates for Medicaid-eligible women.Conclusions
So was Rosie’s death a fluke? Probably not. The heavy publicity put out by the prochoice movement about how poor women would be “forced” to resort to dangerous criminal abortions probably left Rosie, and some others like her, with the mistaken impression that criminal abortion (rather than birth or even sliding-scale legal abortion) was their only option.
So I’d place the blame for the death of Rosie Jiminez not on the Hyde Amendment, but on several factors:
- Readily available public funds for abortion had taught her that she need not be careful about her sexual activity and/or birth control.
- Public relations efforts by prochoice groups left women like Rosie with the belief that criminal abortion was their only option.
- Rosie’s doctor abandoned her, instead of referring her for appropriate counseling and care.
- The McAllen midwife was willing to play Russian roulette with women’s lives instead of referring them for either prenatal care or low-cost sanitary abortions.
- Since she’d never had to pay for her own abortion before, Rosie was apparently unaware that a legal abortion was available for only a few dollars more than what the dirty local midwife was charging.
I agree with abortion advocates that the death of Rosie Jiminez was avoidable. But I disagree with them that lack of public funding was to blame. Prochoice people all around Rosie had opportunities to steer her toward a “safe and legal” abortion, had they chosen to do so. The problem was that nobody ever seemed to entertain the notion that abortion might not be the answer in the first place.
What’s additionally puzzling about this whole turn of events is that the facility to which Planned Parenthood referred abortion patients charged only $130 for an abortion for poor women, just $10 more than Rosie paid for the amateur abortion that took her life. It’s difficult to believe that a $10 price difference put the legal abortion out of Rosies’s reach, espcially since the day before she’d spent $8 on a cake for a friend’s baby shower, and she had a $800 scholarship check in her purse.
I don’t believe that the CDC’s reported death numbers are accurate, but they’re all we have to work with, and more to the point, abortion supporters place great faith in them.
- CDC Abortion Surveillance Summary 1977;
- “The Safety of Legal Abortion and the Hazards of Illegal Abortion,” NARAL, 1/25/2001;
- “Remember women’s lives and rights,” Kaimin Online, Oct. 18, 2002
- Death certificate
- 19th century
- abortion mill
- abortion mortality
- abortionists — female
- abortionists — male
- black women
- botched abortion
- delay in transport
- delay in treatment
- district of columbia
- dumped body
- falsifying forms
- fetal indications
- former criminal abortionist
- george tiller
- hemorrhage death
- illegal – doctor
- illegal – midwife
- illegal – nurse
- illegal – paramedical
- illegal – post roe
- illegal – unknown
- illegal – untrained
- illegal abortion
- inadequate documents
- inadequate equipment
- inadequate resuscitation
- incomplete abortion
- legal abortion
- maternal indications
- maternal mortality
- national abortion federation
- new jersey
- new mexico
- new york
- north carolina
- planned parenthood
- pre-roe legal
- previous misconduct
- questionable stories
- secret abortion